How might planners incorporate reparative justice practices to address the harms generated by white supremacy in our cities? Recent literature highlights how repair and healing relate to planning theory, yet few empirical case studies examine how reparative planning translates into practice. In "From Infrastructural Repair to Reparative Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association (Vol. 89, No. 4), Lily Song and Elifmina Mizrahi urge planners to advance reparative justice goals across the issue areas, sectors, and organizations where we work in solidarity with the reparations movement and other anti–racist struggles.
The authors conceptualize reparative planning as a continuum encompassing reparations measures occurring within institutionalized venues and social practices centering those who have been harmed, in seeking:
- Cessation/assurance of non repetition.
Reparative planning extends the tradition of advocacy planning in which planners take an activist role in promoting social justice goals by representing marginalized voices in planning processes and with alternative plans. Sharing roots with equity planning, reparative planning focuses less on expanding choices and opportunities within prevailing economic, political, and social systems and more on stopping the systems, institutions, and practices causing harm, changing them to ensure they are not repeated, and making amends for committed harms.
The authors examine the case of infrastructural repair by the Alliance for Community Transit in Los Angeles (ACT-LA) to address racialized disinvestment and brutality present in the regional transit system. ACT-LA's Reimagining Safety campaign is a divest-invest initiative that aims to shift funding from LA Metro's multi-agency law enforcement contract to fund critical investments in job creation, inclusive safety services, and rider-friendly active spaces that promote holistic safety for residents.
Following the lead of Black Lives Matter and People's Budget LA, ACT-LA decisively initiated the community-based infrastructural mobilization to push policy changes at LA Metro beginning in summer of 2020. Applying a community-based and public health safety framework, the campaign laid out a strategy for Community Safety Through Environmental Design that promoted holistic safety for all LA County residents (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Community safety through environmental design. Source ACT-LA (2021).
Song and Mizrahi used a multi-method research design combining direct participation and nonparticipant observation with document-based research using primary and secondary sources such as the reparations measures in California and Los Angeles. They also conducted interviews with ACT-LA staff and a member organization to understand enabling conditions, opportunities, and challenges of the Reimagining Safety campaign along with personal trajectories, experiences, and perspectives related to the creative work of advancing repair, healing, and justice through spatial practice.
The authors findings help expand points of entry and paths for reparative planning, inform strategies by planners embracing the reparative turn, and strengthen connections between community-based mobilizations and reparative planning. ACT-LA's practices of centering most-affected communities, cross-racial coalition building, and shared activism can inform planners who seek to advance reparative justice goals. On the basis of this work, LA's Metro Board of Directors approved $40 million for seeding alternative public safety strategies as well as securing seats on Metro's Public Safety Advisory Committee.
Despite this success, Metro has yet to shift public investments out of the policing contracts. For planners in training like me, a deeper dive into complementary anti-racist actions and strategies inside and outside institutional boundaries would help identify strategies to dismantle institutions of white supremacy. As the authors note, no divest-invest campaign alone can guarantee limiting the racial harms of policing.
The Journal of the American Planning Association is the quarterly journal of record for the planning profession. For full access to the JAPA archive, APA members may purchase a discounted digital subscription for $36/year.
Top image: iStock/Getty Images Plus - Laser1987
About the author
Jess Shakesprere is a master in urban planning candidate at Harvard University.